Moral Considerations
All the moral points were secured, with regards to the recommendations regarding Quality No. of the Ministry from Fitness. The run is authorized by the Stability and you can Look Chamber of the latest Centro de- Filosofia age Ciencias Humanas of your own Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) (CAAE No. 03490118.8. and you will Protocol Zero. 3.). To the front-page of on the web questionnaire, you will find the newest Totally free and you will Told Agree Label (FICT), and therefore showed information regarding the dangers and advantages of reacting this new data, therefore the make certain out-of withdrawal of concur, in place of prejudice and also at any moment. Only those members whom featured the new concur choice got use of the analysis posts. People who failed to check the consent solution was redirected to help you the end of the survey.
To investigate you can differences in PCM and you will NCM, according to sociodemographic parameters: sex, career, proper care of more youthful sisters, exposure or absence of somebody, and achieving or perhaps not with college students, evaluations ranging from organizations were made making use of the Mann-Whitney You take to ( Dining table 1).
In the 1st, the connection anywhere between PCM and you may NCM try evaluated also it are found that PCM (M = ; DP = ) correlates adversely towards the NCM (Yards = ; DP = ); kissbrides.com adress p =
Statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were found in PCM in three categories tested: occupation (U = 37; p = .035; PS est = .47), presence/absence of partner (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .29) and presence/absence of children (U = 21; p = .002; PS est = .44). It was observed that the participants who were unemployed (Mdn = ), who had one or more children (Mdn = ) and who were in a relationship (Mdn = ); had significantly higher levels of PCM than people who worked (Mdn = ), who had no children (Mdn = ) and who did not have a relationship (Mdn = ).
On the other hand, NCM indicated statistically significant differences with small effect sizes related to sex (U = 19; p = .000; PS est = .43) and the presence/absence of children (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .34). It was observed that both women (Mdn = ) as for the participants who do not have children (Mdn = ) have significantly higher levels of NCM than men (Mdn = ) and participants with children (Mdn = ).
Based on the results obtained in the comparison between people who are or are not in a stable relationship, we tested the possible differences in PCM according to the type of relationship using the Kruskal Wallis test. 000). Mann-Whitney tests were used to follow up on this finding. A Bonferroni correction was applied and all effects were tested at the .02 level. PCM levels showed no differences between people who were dating and people who were married or in a stable union (U = 29; p = .039; PS est = .47). However, statistically significant differences were found in PCM levels between married and in a stable union (U = 5; p = .000; PS est = .41), of which married people (Mdn = ) had higher levels of PCM when compared to people who were in a stable union (Mdn = ).
Two Spearman correlations was basically held. 000; roentgen = -.494; r dos = .24. Throughout the next study the fresh new matchmaking anywhere between PCM, NCM and 16 individual and you will contextual variables was in fact examined and certainly will get noticed when you look at the Table 2. Weakened connections was basically discovered each other positive and negative between PCM otherwise NCM and you will twelve of the details looked at. Especially the new sociodemographic details: “amount of sisters” and you can “delivery purchase” plus the personality affairs: “conscientiousness” and you can “transparency to tackle” presented no extreme correlations with PCM and you will NCM.
